November 6, 2020

I, as an IPC CIT, and Test Engineer at Foxconn would like to see a standard for the transferring of specification information created the various CAD outputs. IPC has improved overall industry quality with standards such as J-STD-001, IPC-A-610 and IPC-7711/21 and I believe IPC-2581 standard can achieve a similar outcome to the aforementioned standards.

November 6, 2020

I, Jeff Heidel, work as a PCB Designer and Team Lead at VIAVI Solutions. I recently attended the 2581 users meeting at IPC APEX in San Diego and I like the direction that the standard is going and I would like to find out how I can be more involved. Today documenting FAB requirements is…

November 6, 2020

I, Brien Blankenship, have worked as a PCB designer @ Intel Corp for the last 15 years. I would like to see the adoption of IPC-2581 as a standard for data transmission from CAD to Fab vendor as I believe it to be a benefit to the industry as a whole. I support IPC-2581 and…

October 28, 2020

Koh Young, measurement-based inspection solutions provider, joined the IPC-2581 Consortium this week to support the adoption and use of IPC-2581 (DPMX) for design data transfer to machines on factory floor to improve efficiency and reduce costs for electronics manufacturers. Using IPC-DPMX (IPC-2581) with IPC-CFX will deliver engineering (design) data directly to machines to streamline the process…

July 13, 2020

I am a Senior Systems Analyst at Mitutoyo America Corporation, a global manufacturer of metrology systems. I believe that the IPC-2581 standard will benefit the whole PCB design and supply chain industry, thus, I support IPC-2581 standard and encourage others to do the same. This is my personal opinion, not on the behalf of my…

July 9, 2020

I work as a CAD Engineer for Apple HW. I am looking into the feasibility of transitioning manufacturing outputs from ODB++ to IPC2581 07/02/2020    

May 9, 2020

I, Jens Pejtersen work as a Hardware Design Engineer at WS Audiology. I believe that IPC-2581 standard will benefit the whole PCB design and supply chain industry, thus, I support IPC-2581 standard and encourage others to do the same. This is my personal opinion, not on the behalf of my company. 05/08/2020

May 1, 2019

A wonderful short article written by Lou Shababy, a PCB Design lead at Eaton Lighting Controls Division, in this month’s issue of PCD&F Magazine. In this article Lou talks about why IPC-2581 is a better format to use.  Besides the hand-off benefits, he argues that since there is intelligence in the data package, DFM checks…

January 17, 2019

At this year’s APEX show we will explore new opportunities to expand the format. There will be user group and committtee meetings and a Buzz Session at this year’s APEX event. Be sure not to miss it. How IPC-2581 Enables Industry 4.0 Tuesday, Jan 29 — 3:30 PM to 5:00 PM | Buzz Session 2…