Author: ipc2581

April 16, 2021

I am one of the co-founders and Chief Product Officer at CELUS, and would like to contribute to the IPC-2581 and foster more standards like the IPC-2581 for digital information exchange among different software used in the development process of electronics. I believe this step is crucial for improving development processes and increasing efficiency, thus…

April 9, 2021

I, Cyril Buttay, am a researcher with Laboratoire Ampere. I’m interested in the IPC-2581 standard as a way to exchange data between eCAD and simulation software, to develop more advanced virtual prototyping tools for electronics  

January 29, 2021

I, Dave Cartwright, work as a PCB designer at Ultrasound Design Limited – UK. I feel strongly that the IPC-2581 standard will benefit the whole PCB design and supply chain industry & we should have had it years ago. I support the IPC-2581 standard and encourage others (including companies) to do the same. This is…

November 6, 2020

I, as an IPC CIT, and Test Engineer at Foxconn would like to see a standard for the transferring of specification information created the various CAD outputs. IPC has improved overall industry quality with standards such as J-STD-001, IPC-A-610 and IPC-7711/21 and I believe IPC-2581 standard can achieve a similar outcome to the aforementioned standards.

November 6, 2020

I, Jeff Heidel, work as a PCB Designer and Team Lead at VIAVI Solutions. I recently attended the 2581 users meeting at IPC APEX in San Diego and I like the direction that the standard is going and I would like to find out how I can be more involved. Today documenting FAB requirements is…

November 6, 2020

I, Brien Blankenship, have worked as a PCB designer @ Intel Corp for the last 15 years. I would like to see the adoption of IPC-2581 as a standard for data transmission from CAD to Fab vendor as I believe it to be a benefit to the industry as a whole. I support IPC-2581 and…

October 28, 2020

Koh Young, measurement-based inspection solutions provider, joined the IPC-2581 Consortium this week to support the adoption and use of IPC-2581 (DPMX) for design data transfer to machines on factory floor to improve efficiency and reduce costs for electronics manufacturers. Using IPC-DPMX (IPC-2581) with IPC-CFX will deliver engineering (design) data directly to machines to streamline the process…

July 13, 2020

I am a Senior Systems Analyst at Mitutoyo America Corporation, a global manufacturer of metrology systems. I believe that the IPC-2581 standard will benefit the whole PCB design and supply chain industry, thus, I support IPC-2581 standard and encourage others to do the same. This is my personal opinion, not on the behalf of my…

July 9, 2020

I work as a CAD Engineer for Apple HW. I am looking into the feasibility of transitioning manufacturing outputs from ODB++ to IPC2581 07/02/2020